Pages

Friday, July 10, 2009

I'm American, with Hispanic Parents and Here's why I'm Conservative

As California Native, I once considered myself a Democrat. I was once a starry-eyed freshman-college student feeling the need to be in lock step with fellow college students in what at the time I believed was right. On the surface, how could you not be allured with the promise of stopping global/national poverty, equality for all, and helping the world?

I decided to delve deep into these issues and do the intellectually honest thing and study those issues I believed in so that I could more persuasively make those arguments. Oddly enough, the evidence overwhelmingly did not support the liberal perspective of the world. On the contrary the evidence proved to be strongly contrary to liberal perspective and closely aligned on conservative lines.

On poverty, how is the poor better served. You give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; you feed him for a lifetime. So is the idea of perpetual welfare. Now before liberals freak out, I care about the poor. I believe that there should be a very limited welfare system that helps those who GENUINELY fall into devastating times to get back on their feet and become productive members of society once again. That being said, welfare is one of the most cruel and inhumane social experiments in the history of the United States. Before Lyndon B Johnson’s Great Society came into effect, welfare rolls were at 4.1% of families. By 1980 the number skyrocketed to 10%. LBJ’s Great Society and War on Poverty utterly failed and everyone knew it. So much so that under Democratic President Bill Clinton, led by a Republican Congress welfare reform won stunning support and decreased welfare rolls by 60%! Welfare as envisioned by liberals is intended to create an underclass of society and a perpetual voter base. Welfare destroys human drive and motivation. Perpetual welfare is the new slavery. Liberals are interested in control not helping people, for if helping people were their goals then the results should speak for themselves. Liberals often speak in rhetorical flourishes with very little evidence to back up their programs. We need to demand RESULTS not intent. For all of liberals’ historical claims of restoring science to its rightful place, you would think that results would make a difference. Interestingly enough and despite results being stacked completely against their programs, they push them forward anyways.

Equality for all, how to best achieve it? To this question I have to direct our inquiry to the Constitution. Our founding document is brilliant in its careful and thoughtful construction as a document that preserves & protects our God given rights; life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Once again we have to look at the results of the liberal cry that racism and injustice defines America. How can a people and country be racist and unjust if from within its own legal framework, all people regardless of race, religion, gender and any background were made free? In no other country has anyone from a group of people that at one point was considered slaves, have ever risen to the highest office in that same country and that same legal construct. Such is the case of the United States, a tribute to the Constitution and the struggle of the soldiers that have given their full measure of devotion that this country not perish from the earth.

The GOP has been a banner of conservative values and of upholding the constitution. To be considered a party of racists is factually and intellectually dishonest. No other party has done more to further the equal rights of man than the GOP. The GOP is the party of Lincoln that abolished slavery, freed 60% of our nation’s poor from dependency and a soft slavery. As quoted by Jerome Hudson, a fellow Republican and author of “Life of a Young Black Conservative” The GOP is the;

Anti-Slavery Party, the party responsible for: the 13th (abolished slavery), 14th (gave former slaves full citizenship rights), the 15th Amendment (gave slaves voting rights), the Civil Rights Act of 1871(protecting southern blacks from the Ku Klux Klan), the Reconstruction Acts, and the 1866, 1875, 1957, 1960, and 1964 Civil Rights Acts.

And no, my brothers and sisters, yesterday’s southern Democrats are NOT today’s Republicans! If so, former Klansman, Sen. Robert Byrd—the highest ranking senate Democrat and President Pro-Tempore of the Senate—apparently didn’t get the memo and forgot to switch parties. 

But it’s more than just the history. I’m proud to stand for self-empowerment, personal responsibility, strong family values, small government, low taxes, free markets, a strong military, and individual achievement etc. 

And don’t even get me started on which side stands up for the precious 1.4 million unborn children (32% of whom are black), who will be casualties in the war inside the womb. When I see these so-called “black leaders” bashing conservatives for “racist policies,” I wonder how they justify cheering on the political team who proudly defends the annihilation of 13 million black children since 1973.”

On the last issue, helping the world. The best way to do so is through being the best country that we can be through empowering each individual to achieve unparalleled success. How could this be so, how can a capitalist system be the best for the world, doesn’t it promote selfishness and greed? I would say yes and no to that same question but here’s why. Capitalism is a system based on self-interest but why is that a bad thing. We are all self-interested by human nature and to say otherwise is dishonest. Even the most liberal individual donates money and time because he takes more self-interest in charity and that makes him/her feel better about him/herself. But how is it that this individual came to a financial position to be able to donate money and time? If this person hadn’t accumulated the wealth somehow then he wouldn’t be able to help others. If they hadn’t been self-interested enough to earn the money to pass it along then no one would benefit from the donation. Indeed, the richest individuals of this country have done more to feed poor and provide them with the basic necessities than a whole world of well wishes. That is the story of this great nation, one that has generated so much prosperity as to impel its citizens to generosity and the ability to help millions around the world through private donations. Our current administration seeks to alter this generosity by forcing people into volunteerism. Forcing people to do things is not volunteerism and we all need to forcefully argue that position. In this country “time is money” and government forcing us to give time is nothing short of theft. Charity should be of our own freewill and so should volunteerism. Any mandatory charity or volunteerism is in fact theft!

Another movement, Globalism, has been maligned for two reasons each of which are complete and utter false constructs of the left.

First is the issue of keeping jobs in the US and second is the claim that globalism is slave labor. Liberals domestic policies have forced jobs overseas. The death grip of labor unions in liberal states has created competitive disadvantages for American companies competing with foreign companies without those labor laws. Again, before liberals freak, I support fair treatment of workers and decent wages. What liberals are talking about is not that. Liberals again seek power. As we have seen with the current bankruptcy of Chrysler and GM, Labor Unions made out like bandits as this administration has completely erased 230+ years of bankruptcy laws and finance laws. Bondholders have always been first in line to receive the principal in their investment during a bankruptcy for a very good reason. This has enabled companies to borrow from investors and has been the backbone of capitalism. Bondholders were wiped out and as the first in line creditors have been given mere pennies on the dollar while Labor Unions were handed over control of two of the largest companies in the US. Labor Unions led to the bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler and now they are in charge of running them, along with the US government. Labor Unions are not interested in just wages and compensation. They have become insatiable beasts devouring the hand that feeds them. How is it that companies are vilified if they have conferences at country clubs but Labor Unions can own a $27 Million country club. Additionally, while the average American is struggling to keep jobs or find jobs, Labor Unions have plush jobs banks where members are earning a paycheck for doing nothing but sitting at home on the couch. Retirees in Labor Unions have unsustainable plush retirement plans (far higher than the industry average and even American average) that drain companies of capital, the average American has had their 401Ks or retirement vanish. GM and Chrysler were unable to adequately restructure because of the labor mandates requiring the factory to have a minimum number of jobs and a minimum number of hours allocated to each of the employees. While Toyota uses employees where a human touch is vital and machines for tasks that make economic sense, GM and Chrysler are forced to make decisions based on Labor Union mandate. How are American companies supposed to compete in that environment?

Globalism is not slave labor and evidence has pointed out that while to an American, working for $1 per day sounds inconceivable, that salary is a Godsend to citizens of a country whose average income is $0.50 per day. Furthermore, the idea that these workers work under the worst standards is also false because in example after example, those factories have in fact improved the standards of living and working conditions based on the conditions that are present in the country before their arrival. No they aren’t to American standards but as we have already discussed, not even the average American has the standards imposed on Unionized companies by the Labor Unions.

As I stated earlier, I am American with Hispanic parents. I choose to not hyphenate my identity because it is identity politics (mastered by Liberals) that has ripped this country in two. I choose to be American first because I identify first and foremost with our principals. I was born and raised in this great country and I refuse to let my allegiance to be split. I appreciate the music, the food, and the culture that my parents were raised in. I do not denounce any of it. I just believe that American principles are far superior and have produced the best civilization in the history of humanity. I seek to conserve those principals and that civilization. So yes I am proudly a conservative and member of the Grand Old Party!

"Staunch Obama supporter" kicked out 65 Black kids of Private Pool!

Surprise Surprise, Democrats who used racism and racial pandering to elect a President, NOW spite those people they USED to elect their Socialist Leader! Obama supporter is President of Private Club that kicked out the 65 black kids. See the coverup and outrage!
http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/07/09/yes-the-president-of-the-valley-swim-club-is-a-john-g-duesler-jr/

The Case Against Government Motors!

I will be compiling an extensive list of articles that highlight the evils of Government interference! The evidence will support the case against and strong indictment of the Federal Governement and why you should BOYCOTT GM!
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/07/09/strike-a-blow-for-freedom-dont-buy-gm/

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

FORGETTING SARAH PALIN

by Ann Coulter
July 8, 2009

Sarah Palin has deeply disappointed her enemies. People who hate her guts feel she's really let them down by resigning.

She's like the ex-girlfriend they're SO over, never want to see again, have already forgotten about -- really, it's O-ver -- but they just can't stop talking about her.

Liberal: Ha, ha ... Sarah who? She's over, she's toast, a future Trivial Pursuit answer, nothing more.

Normal person: Whatever. How about the North Korean missiles?

Liberal: Can you believe she just resigned the governorship like that? What a quitter!

Normal person: Speaking of quitting, how's work?

Liberal: Did you hear she might get a TV show? There's no way Sarah Palin's getting a TV show! No way! I can't believe stupid Sarah Palin could get her own stupid TV show now. Well, I'm sure not gonna watch it -- that's for sure!

Normal person: Have you seen all the Michael Jackson coverage on TV?

Liberal: How does she think she can run for president in 2012 if she can't finish her term as governor of a Podunk state? She's finished.

Normal person: OK, then! You won't have to vote for her.

Liberal: I was never going to vote for her! But now I'm not going to vote for her twice. And I will never watch her TV show. I am so over her.

Reporters had already written their stories on Palin's press conference -- "rambling!" "incoherent!" -- before she even stepped to the podium.

Whatever you think of Palin, her argument for resigning was the opposite of "rambling" and "incoherent."

Palin's basketball analogy couldn't have been clearer, even to prissy liberal pundits who get uncomfortable when the subject turns to sports: She decided to destroy the other team's game plan, which has been to obsessively focus on her, by resigning.

This is particularly apt here -- she's passing the ball to a fantastic right-wing lieutenant governor, who shares her principles but doesn't set off the left's neuroses.

This is better for him, better for the state, better for the conservative program and better for Palin personally, whose family is sick of all the crap. Now she can make a lot of money and promote conservatism on a national stage.

It certainly won't be held against Palin by people who don't already loathe her. (On the other hand, her approval ratings among people who think she's worse than Hitler are down to 48 percent.)

With the left frenetically filing ethics complaint after ethics complaint against Palin, costing her state millions of dollars and her personally half a million dollars, citizens of Alaska must be asking, "Can we please have our state back?"

But to read the news reports -- which actually were rambling and incoherent -- you would think Palin was speaking in tongues.

The truth is liberals are furious they won't have Sarah Palin to kick around anymore -- at least not with Palin's hands tied behind her back by her public office.

Something tells me Keith Olbermann isn't going to be pulling any big numbers this summer attacking Eric Cantor and Michele Bachmann. I don't anticipate any sudden outbreaks of "Mitch McConnell Derangement Syndrome."

Soon we'll only hear about Keith when his creepy e-mails using his mother's death to hit on chicks start making the rounds again. (Tip to Keith: When a girl refuses to give you her phone number, her assistant's phone number or her personal e-mail address, and only gives you her assistant's e-mail address, you're not halfway in the sack.)

Bonus: If Olbermann gets canceled as a result of Palin's resignation, that will put her in a really good position for 2012.

But instead of being honest and saying, "Oh well, it was a good ride while it lasted," liberal chatterers indignantly demand: "Is this not the greatest betrayal a public servant ever committed against the people?"

On one hand, liberals are enraged at the heinousness of Mark Sanford -- whom they didn't vote for -- for not resigning and, on the other, they're enraged at Palin -- whom they also didn't vote for -- for resigning.

The peculiarly venomous hatred of Palin is driven by women of the left and their whipped consorts. All that needs to happen is for a feminist to overhear two Nation readers saying, "I hate to admit it, but Palin is kind of hot" and ...

WHAT??????????? YOU CALL THAT HOT? I'LL HAVE YOU KNOW WE'VE GOT A MEGA-SUPER HOTTIE IN DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ. AND NEED I REMIND YOU AGAIN OF THE RAW SEX APPEAL OF RACHEL MADDOW?

Democrats are a party of women, and nothing drives them off their gourds like a beautiful Christian conservative. (How much money has that other beautiful born-again, Carrie Prejean, been forced to spend on lawyers to respond to liberal hysteria?)

So the motives are clear, but the money is not. Who is paying the rent for the losers filing all these frivolous complaints against Palin?

At least when Richard Mellon Scaife was funding investigations of Bill Clinton, we knew who Scaife was, he was an American citizen, and his money was accessible to U.S. tax authorities and not stashed in offshore accounts like a certain Hungarian Nazi-collaborator I can name.

How about some modern-day Scaife investigate the investigators?

COPYRIGHT 2009 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106

The Life of a Young Black Conservative

Per Glenn Beck's Newsletter...

July 8, 2009

Last week Glenn got a call from a very impressive young man named Jerome Hudson, who told Glenn he had written an op-ed during the 2008 election on being a black conservative. He sent it in and it's fantastic. Enjoy!

While attending a black fraternity party, I recently learned it’s a bad idea to profess one’s affinity for Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity.

Worse, according to current polls, it appears I may be the only black 22 year old in America who will be voting for Sen. John McCain.

It’s not that I was unaware that being a black conservative Republican puts me in the ultimate “minority.” After all, Shelby Steele’s classic article “ The Loneliness of the Black Conservative” has become an article of faith that I’ve all but committed to memory.

But I guess I had made the mistake of buying into all that liberal yammering about being “open minded” and supporting “diversity” that I’d deluded myself into believing that a civil, discussion about the herd-like ideological mentality of so many of my contemporaries suffer from was possible.

Boy, was I wrong. Big time!

My official “Negro” card got stripped away. I instantly lost my “blackness.” And now, consequently, I now am greeted with this: “Hey, y’all, here comes The Black Republican.”

And that’s when I think to myself, Hmmm…so this is how it feels to be an "Uncle Tom."

Still, being labeled “The Black Republican” is undoubtedly a promotion from: "Hey, why are you dressed so nice? You got a job interview or something?" Or, worse, “Man, why are you talking like that? You sound white? Who do you think you are? A conservative Kanye West?"

But my path to ideological emancipation began where all the most important things always begin—with my father and mother. Growing up, my Army drill sergeant father was a firm believer in tough love. My parents instilled in us Christian values. But I believe that first part—having an involved mother and father—was critical. With 70% of all black babies being born out-of-wedlock, it’s no wonder black poverty remains entrenched, welfare has become a way of life, and that many of my fellow young black male counterparts choose gangsta life over college.

But it wasn’t until college that I realized I had been ensnared in what John McWhorter calls the “Cult of Victimology.” One of my professor’s pointed me toward a world of literature I’d never been introduced to: Thomas Sowell, John McWhorter, Shelby Steele, Star Parker, Angela McGlowan, Larry Elder, Walter Williams—they obliterated the Leftist foolishness that floods my community.

It was then that my eyes were opened to the truth, a truth that my father was willing to give his life for, a truth that hundreds of thousands of American soldiers have paid the ultimate price to pass on to future generations. And that truth is this: America remains the greatest country that God gave to man.

So imagine me, a member of various organizations that largely consist of young black Americans, most of whom are womb to the tomb Democrats and liberals, speaking openly about the many opportunities and blessings we enjoy in our great nation and refuting Michelle Obama’s supposition that America is a “downright mean place..”

Can you say…..social suicide?

"So Jerome,” the partygoers asked, “you’re REALLY a Republican?!"

Duh!

Of course I’m a Republican! And your great grandparents were too!

Yes, I’m a member of the Anti-Slavery Party, the party responsible for: the 13th (abolished slavery), 14th (gave former slaves full citizenship rights), the 15th Amendment (gave slaves voting rights), the Civil Rights Act of 1871(protecting southern blacks from the Ku Klux Klan), the Reconstruction Acts, and the 1866, 1875, 1957, 1960, and 1964 Civil Rights Acts.

And no, my brothers and sisters, yesterday’s southern Democrats are NOT today’s Republicans! If so, former Klansman, Sen. Robert Byrd—the highest ranking senate Democrat and President Pro-Tempore of the Senate—apparently didn’t get the memo and forgot to switch parties.

But it’s more than just the history. I’m proud to stand for self-empowerment, personal responsibility, strong family values, small government, low taxes, free markets, a strong military, and individual achievement etc.

And don’t even get me started on which side stands up for the precious 1.4 million unborn children (32% of whom are black), who will be casualties in the war inside the womb. When I see these so-called “black leaders” bashing conservatives for “racist policies,” I wonder how they justify cheering on the political team who proudly defends the annihilation of 13 million black children since 1973.

And conservatives don’t care about black people? I don’t think so!

No, I think I’ll ride with the team who says enough with the welfare cancer that has destroyed people’s innate desire to achieve. Yes, I’ll ride with the folks who respect me enough to consider me their equal and not insult me with Affirmative Action racism. Yeah, I’ll ride with the gang who would rather create effective policies than emotional “feel good” symbolism that robs individuals of their desire to aspire.

So while it may take a little getting used to walking into college parties where I’m known as “The Black Republican,” I now realize I am a newly inducted member of a rich tradition of ideologically emancipated black conservatives. And guess what? I’m more than cool with that. I’m proud, actually.

“The conservative Kanye West”?

Hmmm….

Has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it?

Jerome Hudson is a sophomore at Tallahassee Community College with plans to transfer to Florida A&M University in the fall.

Friday, July 3, 2009

Gov Palin Upholding Oath that Pres Obama Broke

Many were quick to pounce on the announcement of Gov Sarah Palin's resignation and call her a quitter, say she doesn't have what it takes, or the most common phrase that she "left Alaska high and dry." Oddly enough, I believe the opposite to be true. Imagine if she spent the next two to three years as Governor either running for higher office or campaigning nationally for candidates that uphold the true intent of the constitution. Would she not in that case have abandoned Alaskans? Is it not more noble to recognize a higher calling and pass the ball to fellow elected and competent officials without the target of the wretched liberal attack machine on your back? Does not the politician that diverts their attention from their current elected office for their own political ambition not leave their constituents high and dry? Do they not split their loyalties and abandon the oath of office they swore to serve their constituents? I never heard anyone accuse, then Senator Obama, that he was leaving Illinoisans high and dry when he spent the entirety of year 3 and 4 of his 6-year term, running for President. Alas, tis another double standard for a woman and for a conservative. I dare the libs criticize this move this way because their Comrade-in-Chief is guiltier than Gov Palin.